Apple Gear Marketing

Mac Price Cuts Are Inevitable, Says Analyst

comments 4

If the economy doesn’t force Apple to lower Mac prices, ultra-low voltage processors will. So claims Stephen Baker, NPD’s vice president of industry analysis. Stephen foresees a dramatic sea change coming in late 2009, as ultra-low voltage processors move more into the mainstream laptop market.

The Intel Atom processor common among low-cost netbooks is one example of the ultra-low voltage class. Stephen predicts these processors will move into the mainstream, The processors will help reduce component costs across the laptop, not just lower price for the main chip, and make smaller, more affordable laptops more common.

“That’s going to force down average selling prices,” he told me yesterday. “It isn’t going to force down those mid-price ASPs. What it’s going to do is either force down pricing on the most expensive notebooks or shift sales away from them enough so that [vendors] have to rethink the strategy at those price points—or reduce those price points, too.”

Right now Apple’s entry-level laptop is the older white MacBook, souped up with nVidia graphics, for $999. But the real starting price is $1,299, for the 13.3-inch MacBook. Apple laptop prices go up to $2,799, for the 17-inch MacBook Pro.

“By the end of the year $1,299 will be top of the line for notebooks,” Stephen asserted. “Apple is going to have to come down, maybe not $1,299 but certainly not 2,800 bucks either.” Stephen predicted that Apple’s top of the line could sell for no more than $1,999. The NPD retail analyst asserted that Apple would have to dramatically lower high-end pricing to midrange:

The next threshold is going to be $1,599. I think Apple has to do a $799 notebook. I would be very happy with that. They’ve got to ream in pricing a bit. It’s OK to do that higher pricing when there’s lots of money sloshing around. There’s not a lot of money sloshing around now.

Stephen’s prediction is startling and should concern Wall Street analysts and Apple investors. Apple’s higher pricing means rich margins—and they’re the envy of the computer industry. But those margins won’t be sustainable, if prices so dramatically fall at the high end, even when factoring in reduced component costs. During Apple’s fiscal second quarter, which is largely congruous with first calendar quarter, Mac laptop revenue dropped 12 percent year over year, according to Apple SEC filings. Unit shipments dropped by 2 percent.

Retail Notebook Unit Sales March 2009

Already, Apple is feeling the pricing pinch, in part from the economy but also from the rapid rise in popularity of netbooks. According to NPD, in March, netbooks accounted for 18 percent of all US retail PC sales and 15.6 percent for portables. Apple doesn’t sell netbooks, which, by the way, ship with the aforementioned ultra-low voltage processors.

Mac marketshare declines are inevitable, and they’ve already started. According to Gartner, Apple’s share of the US PC market fell from 9 percent in third quarter 2008 to 8 percent in fourth quarter and 7.4 percent in first quarter 2009. Apple might regain some marketshare by cutting prices now, and there are certainly rumors about iMac and MacBook cuts. Stephen wants that $799 Mac laptop, but I don’t think this is the right time.

Here’s the problem: Analysts are calling for immediate cuts at the low end, which could marginally improve sales and marketshare, but bite into margins. I think Apple should resist the temptation to cut now, doing so in another quarter at the high end. Right now, Apple’s strongest sales are at the low end of the line, which immediate price cuts would compromise.

That said, Apple should slash—and I mean with vengeance—educational Mac prices. The economy has sapped school budgets, a topic of lengthy discussion during last month’s Apple earnings conference call. The current discounts are anything but—$50 off either the white or entry-level aluminum MacBook and $100 off the $1,599 model. Apple should really lower prices for that market: $999 for the $1,299 MacBook and $1,299 for the $1,599 model.

Retail Notebook Sales March 2009

About three Wall Street analysts just fainted reading those price cuts. But the discounts are necessary. Apple could gain much from lower educational pricing, in terms of marketshare and sales wins against Windows OEMs. Times are tough. K-12 schools don’t have the money to spend. I would institute these cuts now and extend them to college students starting in July. Freshmen don’t need another iPod (During back-to-school season Apple usually offers a free iPod, after rebate, with a new Mac laptop). Students need cash in their pockets for textbooks—perhaps purchased from Amazon’s Kindle store for the iPod touch already owned.

As for the broader market, Apple cannot avoid the inevitable price cuts, but delays can preserve margins longer. Apple should close the pricing gap at the high end, by lowering 15-inch MacBook Pro to $1,799 from $1,999 and to $1,999 from $2,499. The 17-inch model probably could sell for $2,799 at least another quarter, even with $800 price difference from the high-end 15-inch model.

Timing is crucial. I believe Stephen is right about the high-end notebook market. It’s not sustainable above $1.599, —certainly not by Christmas. Apple is better cutting prices high, where volumes are lower and margins hardier, than gutting prices and margins for MacBook. For now, and exception being the education market. What do you think?


  1. Peter says on May 12, 2009

    In the opening paragraph you mention “ultra-low voltage processors” as a driving force behind price cuts, but they aren’t mentioned again. It sure isn’t obvious to me why reducing the processor voltage forces price cuts, can you explain?

  2. Joe, I’m not sure that notebook pricing and market share is as important as the bigger picture. Microsoft’s market share dwarfs that of any other company in its markets, but it is also a behemoth that needs to sustain an equally monstrous growth curve to sustain it. As you’ve noted in the recent layoff posts, Microsoft seems to view itself as more vulnerable than Apple.

    I don’t think that battles for market share will change the fact that in the emerging economic climate, not only today’s seismic shifts but also the future’s drastically different landscape, real value (delivered results compared with the cost to obtain those results) will become much more important. This means that a market will become fragmented as different products will deliver the best results per cost ratio to the different markets.

    For example, graphics and video professionals will always represent a small percentage of the PC market (and by PC I mean “Personal Computer”, and do NOT imply “Small Computer Running Windows on Intel CPUs”). These people will get the best value from Mac running Photoshop and Illustrator. The non-professional but artistically-inclined people such as me (also probably a small market) will get the best value from Linux machines running Gimp and Inkscape. Those markets won’t be large, but they won’t go away either. Fragmentation is here to stay. And the company that can stay on top of the profit curve will survive no matter what the market share is.

    Apple’s marketing stresses coolness and a sense of belonging to an elite club. But the real story is that Apple’s products deliver real value to a set of demanding people. And I suspect that the future markets will be more demanding, more intelligent, and more in need of true value with a ratio of results to cost that is greater than 1.0 Because profit is profit no matter what the real cost happens to be.

  3. Steven says on May 19, 2009

    You’ve already stated elsewhere that Apple uses it’s prices in part to maintain margins and value. They’ve made a habit of maintaining consistent price points while upgrading the units they sell at those points. This has been their strategy for quite sometime. I think they will give in to the market to an extent by introducing some competitor in the netbook arena, but it will be something which will recreate that market in its own image.

    But I don’t believe you will see wholesale price reductions at Apple.

Leave a Reply